tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5509207392481380457.post5083545880736696972..comments2023-12-11T06:02:28.864-05:00Comments on The Wise Fool: Sin and DeathTWFhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06016277303703254572noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5509207392481380457.post-84780010590167791262013-04-12T21:31:09.735-04:002013-04-12T21:31:09.735-04:00Nice logic summary, agema-makedonin.Nice logic summary, <b>agema-makedonin</b>.TWFhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06016277303703254572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5509207392481380457.post-45426298919178311562013-04-11T05:04:59.658-04:002013-04-11T05:04:59.658-04:00I know it is from long ago, yet I want to comment ...I know it is from long ago, yet I want to comment on this one.<br /><br />Anonymous, consider the Mantra of many Evangelicals:<br />(1) Hell is eternal.<br />(2) Hell is spiritual death, which is eternal separation from God.<br />(3) Jesus is inseparable part of the trinity, i.e. God.<br />(4) Jesus died to pay the actual wages for sin.<br /><br /><br />If (3) and (4) given (1) and (2) it necessary follows that the Son from the trinity is still in Hell, separated eternally from God.<br /><br />Otherwise, either Jesus did not die for our sins which would cause split in the trinity (that is not what we can have), or he was not part of the trinity (that is also not what we can have), or hell is not eternal separation from God (some liberals consider the choice)!<br /><br />Pick your choice!<br />I hope this illustrates the inconsistency in this doctrine.agema-makedoninhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17141246309473354181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5509207392481380457.post-15635258087975813532009-01-11T21:42:00.000-05:002009-01-11T21:42:00.000-05:00Hi Nate's wife. ;-) Thanks for comment! Very go...Hi Nate's wife. ;-) Thanks for comment! Very good point, indeed. This is one mega-inconsistency I'd recently debated about with a friend of mine. About the best defense that could be said is that it goes back to the original consequence of sin, physical death. That's nice, but (as you point out) it turns a blind eye to the overwhelmingly more significant eternal consequence.TWFhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06016277303703254572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5509207392481380457.post-88958176040286853772009-01-11T17:54:00.000-05:002009-01-11T17:54:00.000-05:00This is something that has bothered me for some ti...This is something that has bothered me for some time. Jesus, who is immortal, paid a mortal and physical price to atone for the sins of humanity. The NT says that humans, who are mortal (because of sin or whatever it may be) are doomed to suffer immortal and eternal spriritual death. If we're being consistent, wouldn't Jesus have to die AND suffer in hell for eternity? It seems like a bit of nepotism in that get out of hell free card he plays. (BTW, I am Nate's wife. I thought I'd join the fun.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com